Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 

From: http://www.lloydwhitling.com/Content/Colligion/About.html

About Colligion

(More of What is this strange new word and why is it important?)

by Lloyd Harrison Whitling

Hit Counter


 

Colligion gets derived from 'colligation' and 'colligate'.

col·li·gate (k¼l"¹-g³t") tr.v. col·li·gat·ed, col·li·gat·ing, col·li·gates. 1. To tie or group together. 2. Logic. To bring (isolated facts) together by an explanation or hypothesis that applies to them all. [Latin collig³re, collig³t- : com-, com- + lig³re, to tie, bind; see leig- below.] --col"li·ga"tion n. 
---American Heritage---

..and from the Merriam Webster's:

transitive senses 
1 : to bind, unite, or group together
2 : to subsume (isolated facts) under a general concept
intransitive senses   : to be or become a member of a group or unit
  –colligation \*k*-l*-*g*-sh*n\  noun

We want to make sure we are making proper use of these words, or that the usage we would turn them to stays in step with past usage.

From the British Oxford Dictionary:

Colli'gate: Bound together, fastened, attached.

'Colligate: 1. To bind or fasten together, to connect. 2. To bind together in a common interest or function, or in a class or order; to unite. 3. inductive logic. To connect together (isolated facts) by a general notion or hypothesis. 4. linguistics. To be in colligation. Also, to group words in colligation with other elements.

PROBLEMS: Searching for the word 'colligate' on the Internet turned up several instances where the word 'collegiate' had been misspelled into it. For those who seek to verify my work, this might be confusing unless you have been alerted to it. Also, the word 'facts' is not often used in a strictly secular sense, as facts are often regarded to mean items one can dredge up from literature, anecdotal accounts, scriptures (even when they are in conflict). Any discussion then turns into arguments about whose facts are better, "righter", more authoritative, or more real. Beliefs turn into facts where Argumentum ad Populum is allowed free rein.

We don't want to support usages derived from logical fallacies, however, and that is why we have pursued this study. We will consider only facts to be facts, items for which hard evidence can be produced from the natural world to support them. With that in mind, our voyage into the world of colligion begins. What do others have to say about these words?


From http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/colligate
Part of Speech:   verb
Definition:   assemble
Synonyms:   abridge, accumulate, amass, anthologize, arrange, assemble, bring together, collate, collect, colligate, collocate, compose, concentrate, congregate, consolidate, cull, draw together, edit, garner, gather, glean, group, heap up, marshal, muster, organize, put together, recapitulate, unite
Antonyms:   disperse, dissemble, scatter, separate
Source:   Roget's New Millennium™ Thesaurus, First Edition (v 1.3.1)
Copyright © 2006 by Lexico Publishing Group, LLC. All rights reserved

From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/colligations

Thesaurus Legend:  Synonyms 
Verb 1. colligate - make a logical or causal connection; "I cannot connect these two pieces of evidence in my mind"; "colligate these facts"; "I cannot relate these events at all"
remember - exercise, or have the power of, memory; "After the shelling, many people lost the ability to remember"; "some remember better than others"
 
cerebrate, cogitate, think - use or exercise the mind or one's power of reason in order to make inferences, decisions, or arrive at a solution or judgments; "I've been thinking all day and getting nowhere"
 
interrelate - place into a mutual relationship; "I cannot interrelate these two events"
 
correlate - bring into a mutual, complementary, or reciprocal relation; "I cannot correlate these two pieces of information"
 
identify - conceive of as united or associated; "Sex activity is closely identified with the hypothalamus"
 
free-associate - associate freely; "Let's associate freely to bring up old memories"
 
have in mind, think of, mean - intend to refer to; "I'm thinking of good food when I talk about France"; "Yes, I meant you when I complained about people who gossip!"
  2. colligate - consider (an instance of something) as part of a general rule or principle
include - consider as part of something; "I include you in the list of culprits"

 

From http://dictionary.laborlawtalk.com/colligate

By Wordnet Dictionary:

Verb 1.

colligate - make a logical or causal connection; "I cannot connect these two pieces of evidence in my mind"; "colligate these facts"; "I cannot relate these events at all"

    Antonyms: decouple, dissociate - regard as unconnected; "you must dissociate these two events!"; "decouple our foreign policy from ideology"
    Synonyms: associate, tie in, relate, link, link up, connect
  2. colligate - consider (an instance of something) as part of a general rule or principle
    Synonyms: subsume

By Webster Dictionary:

Colligate: (?), v. t. 1. To tie or bind together.
The pieces of isinglass are colligated in rows. Nicholson.
2. (Logic) To bring together by colligation; to sum up in a single proposition.
He had discovered and colligated a multitude of the most wonderful . . . phenomena. Tundall.

Colligate: , a. Bound together.


From http://www.thefreedictionary.com/colligation

Thesaurus
Noun 1. colligation - the state of being joined together
anastomosis, inosculation - a natural or surgical joining of parts or branches of tubular structures so as to make or become continuous
 
synapse - the junction between two neurons (axon-to-dendrite) or between a neuron and a muscle; "nerve impulses cross a synapse through the action of neurotransmitters"
 
unification, union - the state of being joined or united or linked; "there is strength in union"
  2. colligation - the connection of isolated facts by a general hypothesis
connexion, association, connection - the process of bringing ideas or events together in memory or imagination; "conditioning is a form of learning by association"
 
inductive reasoning, generalization, induction, generalisation - reasoning from detailed facts to general principles

From http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/COLLIGATE

Verb: colligate  'kólu`geyt
  1. Make a logical or causal connection
    "colligate these facts"
    - associate, tie in, relate, link, link up, connect
     
  2. Consider (an instance of something) as part of a general rule or principle
    - subsume

Type of: cerebrate, cogitate, include, think


From http://www.wordreference.com/definition/colligate

colligate
A verb
  subsume, colligate
 
    consider (an instance of something) as part of a general rule or principle
    Category Tree:
  associate, tie in, relate, link, colligate, link up, connect
 
    make a logical or causal connection; "I cannot connect these two pieces of evidence in my mind"; "colligate these facts"; "I cannot relate these events at all"
    Category Tree:

From http://www.answers.com/topic/colligation

The noun colligation has 2 meanings:

Meaning #1: the state of being joined together
  Synonyms: junction, conjunction, conjugation

Meaning #2: the connection of isolated facts by a general hypothesis

From http://www.usingenglish.com/glossary/colligation.html

Colligation is a type of collocation, but where a lexical item is linked to a grammatical one. Surprising, amazing and astonishing are nearly synonymous. We can say it is astonishing/suprising/amazing, but we tend to say it is not surprising and not the others- surprising colligates [links up] with the negative.


Excerpt from http://ijl.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/4/409

1 For those readers who are not yet familiar with the relatively recent notion of colligation (a term originally coined by Firth), here is how Hoey (1998) defines colligation:
– the grammatical company a word keeps (or avoids keeping) either within its own group or at a higher rank.
– the grammatical functions that the word's group prefers (or avoids).
– the place in a sequence that a word prefers (or avoids).

2 Even a superficial glance at lexical functions shows that they disregard contextual relationships. Thus, the adverb drop-dead may intensify the adjective beautiful with reference to women, but not with reference to buildings.

3 On an alternative construal, the German sequence might be viewed as a colligational pattern or schematic construction (Croft and Cruse 2003): eine ADJ Straßenlage haben, but this seems problematic to the extent that very few adjectives can fill the slot.

4 I use the term ‘concept’ more or less in its standard terminological sense to refer to a ‘unit of thought constituted through abstraction on the basis of properties common to a set of objects or phenomena’.


From http://www.christiancadre.org/purpose.htm

Name of site: Christian Colligation of Apologetics Debate Research & Evangelism

Usage: "And according to Paul's custom, he went to them, and for three Sabbaths reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and giving evidence that the Christ had to suffer and rise again from the dead, and {saying,} 'This Jesus whom I am proclaiming to you is the Christ.'" -- Acts 17:2-3 — [showing that a religious version of colligation refers to accumulating information from their scriptures (LHW)]—


Perusing the foregoing tells us a couple of things, one of which is that (of course) the religious have their own definitions. In the instance shown, the difference is in the source more than the method. Paul used the process of linking together bits of information from the scriptures to colligate that Christ was meant to die and become revived. The importance of that becomes clear when one decides whether or not to recognize that kind of source in any of its variations.

For instance, would a Christian recognize the Quran or the Egyptian Book of the Dead as authoritative? Would a Wiccan person recognize the Christian Bible as authoritative?— or a Jewish person seek authoritative information in the Quran or the New Testament in order to increase his religious understanding? Maybe, were they each trying to understand the relevant religion, but not for their own advancement in their faith, and not to support their own beliefs.

Another distinct difference between religion and colligion inheres from the matter of intention. The religious application of colligation uses it for supporting something already decided. The colligious application limits colligation to gathering of facts to base a decision upon. The processes are the reverse of each other between the two practices.

In the reference materials, we also saw that linguistics has its own usage of 'colligation' as a variant for 'collocation', and we saw examples of how that works for making decisions about word relationships in a lexicon. What it makes obvious is that, when it comes to language, colligation is an important noun relative to the verb, 'colligate'. When one colligates, (s)he is performing colligation. What we are attempting here is to take it one step farther with the word 'colligion', which refers to the assembled result.

When you get right down to it, it matters little how the religious use the word. It is the process that matters, and the source of whatever gets construed as 'facts'. In the secular world, facts come from natural causes. In the religious world, facts come from their scriptures. In the secular world, facts get verified by time tested procedures that test the reality we live in. In the religious world, facts are gleaned from the authorized canons of the particular faith. In the secular world, there can be only one set of facts. In the religious world, there are many sets of facts authorized by the doctrines of the many cults and sects, and assembled in the fertile imaginations of their disciples.

In a manner similar to the mistaken use of 'colligate' for 'collegiate' on so many web pages, I found several which had misspelled 'collision' as 'colligion'. Has something gone awry with our educational system? Perhaps, but that was the only usage of colligion I could uncover, except for one game, and a few pages in a foreign language. It appears the word is ours to do with as we want, and if that turns out to be something important, that is solely a matter of our regard. It is up to us to see or to avoid the implications of what we have going on with this.

 



Copyright ©2006 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. All rights reserved. Visit http://www.lloydwhitling.com for permissions and more free stuff.



Reveal the variants; divulge the discrepancies; elucidate the parameters; speculate the possibilities; comprehend unique solutions.

A literary process by Lloyd Harrison Whitling


Copyright ©2005 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. All rights reserved. Visit http://www.lloydwhitling.com for permissions and more free stuff.

Reveal the variants; divulge the discrepancies; elucidate the parameters; speculate the possibilities; comprehend unique solutions.[Visit Maeka]

A literary process by Lloyd Harrison Whitling   

 

"To deny a right to the experience of pleasure is immoral unless that denial can be justified by a valid presentation of how pain will result from that experience in an amount that would render the expected pleasure regrettable; or, if it can be shown that pain will be induced in others innocent of any involvement. The role of science in moral issues should be to test that, predict that, and find harmless ways to demonstrate that."

— L. H. Whitling in the eBook, Secular Morality, soon to be released

This page last edited on 06/18/2007 

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.