Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 

from http://www.athestlloyd.com/Content/WarOnXmas.html       SML151

The Christians Declare War on Christmas

by Lloyd Harrison Whitling

Hit Counter

To start with, I was raised in the Christian religion and all the traditions that pertain to it. I understood the meaning behind the various slogans and greetings that go along with Christianity, whatever sect of it one might belong to.

This (2005) has been a year that caused me to ask, at least once, "With all of the different kinds of disasters that happen to our country, why do we need terrorism to make us feel threatened?" Indeed, what do terrorists hope to accomplish beyond a mere stirring of the witches' cauldron Mother Nature and our own people have been constantly brewing?

I remember Reverend Bellig leading us in song at our little C&MA Church, where we were warned that TVs were the Devil's Instrument, that Christmas trees were a sacrilege, and that we were never to wear jewelry, post images on our walls, nor have any other thing about our persons that would fixate our minds on anything other than the Christian God. I left the church long ago, but that stark message remains with me everywhere I go.

I thought about it every time I read or heard about Roy Moore's Rock. I thought about it every time I was given to salute our American flag and say the words "under God" in what, to me, constitute a prayer to a graven image. I think about it whenever I see shortened versions of Moses' stone tablets displayed along with pictures purported to be of Jesus wherever I go, not only in people's homes, but in all kinds of governmental edifices and public places, the idols God warned mankind not to offer their esteem. I wonder about it when I hear about the secular people who want public property cleared of all the idols and images purported to represent Jesus and God. I fret about it when I realize that, if the claims are true, then the secular folks –the atheists, agnostics, and whoever else gets included in that– are actually doing the work that their God has challenged the Christians to accomplish.

So, who are these people who are calling themselves Christians while working against the challenges that Christ had posed for them, if the Bible they keep referring us all to is telling the truth? Are they poseurs, lying to the world about the religion they claim to be theirs only to stir up some kind of trouble? I realize the cunningness with which the terrorists work, who would realize our government would get too distracted while looking into the nests of Muslims to worry about self-proclaimed Christians running around and stirring things up. I just don't believe these folks belong to that kind of charade, although I have no proof to tell me otherwise.

But, look: After all the other hokum about what secularists and atheists are proclaimed to be guilty of, along comes a "War on Christmas" that I, now one of those secular people, and therefore supposedly one who is "in" on what is going on with folks like me, had never heard a chirp about until some Catholic guy started griping about the President's Christmas cards. "Happy Holidays" and "Season's Greetings" the politically correct card read, with no mention of Christmas at all. I didn't get one, of course. I had to take the Catholic guy's word for it, along with that of the news anchor who passed the story on to his viewers. I imagine he didn't get one, either, so the entire thing is likely a work of fiction.

Nevertheless, everybody started discussing it, then, and people started marching on those places where the war is supposed to be taking place. I read about a group who marched on the ACLU offices in Washington, carrying signs and singing carols. The workers in the ACLU offices, having never been serenaded (the story goes  on), went out and joined in on the festive moment. One of the workers, a Baptist minister, witnessed to the marchers, whose endeavor turned into a learning experience for them. Here, from another part of that same story, is a quote:

"This year, several groups are once again introducing the Christmas season with some heated and misleading military rhetoric. Some declare, "There is a war against Christmas!" One group launched a "Friend or Foe Christmas Campaign." One particularly bizarre charge is that there is "a thorough and virulent anti-Christmas campaign." Without a shred of evidence, they pretend that there is an effort afoot to remove "God" from the Declaration of Independence. Two groups even announced that they have assembled hundreds of lawyers to protect Christmas against this imaginary threat."

See what I mean? Lawyers are expensive. They should save their money and put it to some good use! I am aware enough about what goes on in my side of things to wonder what they are talking about. The writer of this piece claims the threat is imaginary. In my mind, having only heard about it from the Christian side, I assume he's right.

And, I do know this: In my religious indoctrination I became aware of the significance of the various kinds of greetings. "Merry Christmas" refers to the day, assigned to December 25th, on which the birth of Christ gets celebrated. "Happy Holidays" (this being obvious, because it is plural) and "Season's Greetings" gets to spread the cheer with the whole season in mind. Not only are you to be happy on Christmas, but also on all your days off from the beginning of the season until whenever you finish off after the New Year Carousing Ceremony, all through Hanukkah, Chanukkah, the 12 days, and whatever else occurs during that period that an innocent country boy like me would be unaware about.

So, the President meant, in my Christian-trained mind, to include the entire season, and now a war on Christmas has been declared?— and he has become a soldier on the unChristian side of the battles? I think somebody is poking the fire with a dry stick.

And, I'm really starting to wonder about that terrorism thing.

 

|Next|

 


Copyright ©2005 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. All rights reserved.

[Visit Maeka]

 

 

"To deny a right to the experience of pleasure is immoral unless that denial can be justified by a valid presentation of how pain will result from that experience in an amount that would render the expected pleasure regrettable; or, if it can be shown that pain will be induced in others innocent of any involvement. The role of science in moral issues should be to test that, predict that, and find harmless ways to demonstrate that."

— L. H. Whitling in the eBook, Secular Morality

This page last edited on 01/20/2008 

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.