by Lloyd Harrison Whitling

Good and evil must be strictly regarded according to their effects upon humanity, or as concepts be invalid, for to whatever other worthy task could they be employed but to the service of would-be masters over our rights and freedom to act and to think? Truly evil people must be those who deem evil as good, and aggressively act to perpetuate their inhumane beliefs throughout humanity; elsewise, who else could we legitimately consider evil if not those who would do us harm, or lead us into harming ourselves?

Arguments against the semantic terrorists who occupy the current apparently successful attempts to foist a theocratic government of fascism onto Americans will be mostly counterproductive unless we can learn to cope with the highly refined system of Orwellianism with which they are trained, it seems, from birth. They, who understand little of natural reality unless it fits into their rabid agenda, gullible in their own right, get trained to refer to us as ignorant and immoral savages, and feel free to lodge all kinds of accusations against us as a result of our own untrained ineptness. We are guilty only when we are so trained, or so untrained. By their own words, it is our innocence that makes us guilty.

We, who have had to find our own ways to deal with the world, are disadvantaged because of our late start, our lack of the kind of common understanding that promotes cohesiveness for our own group, and our reluctance to learn the skills for fighting dirty.

We are so naive that we think truth will, of its own accord, win out over the lies and beguiling deception that belligerent antisecularists sweat to perpetuate under truth's banner. We act as though we can sit back, relax, and let life go on and get better with no active support from our own countering efforts. We, the guardians of natural truth and the prime actors in defense of the American Constitution and its amendments, must act as guards will, in response to threats against that which we stand up to protect, and not as aggressive militants who would make forays into the midst of those armies advancing against us.

 That truth will win without anyone to assert it cannot be true unless natural truth is fully understood and a system of values inherent to it developed by assertive action meant to inform and demonstrate its worth to others like ourselves, who should adopt it and go on to inform the world about the nature of true morality.

Thanks to many contributors for this database.

Superstitious (Religious) Backward Terminology

(By Meberman February 16, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this
"I think we need to change the name from “Creationist” to “Evolution Denier” to properly classify them in the same group with Holocaust deniers and any other who chooses to deny the very strong evidence of a given theory or event in favor of their fantasies.")

Empty space just waiting for your

FOOTNOTES:                                 

1: Through altruism, religions attempt to beguile the gullible into sheeplike responses to fear-inducing dogma, based on nothing more than hearsay evidence, to work against their own best interests and betray their own families and societies. The old saying, "Give a man a fish, and he will eat for a day; teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime", forecasts the difference between the results of altruism and practical self-interest. RETURN

2: Any attempts to assert your own views may be met with a charge of ranting, rather than your opponent dealing with anything you said (or wrote). This is a red herring meant to confer guilt from your aggressive opponent back onto you. Don't ever fall for it. Your right to assert your values equals theirs, and your values are more certain than theirs, if you know and understand them.  RETURN

3: Morals derived only from hearsay and unfounded hand-me-down fables have no factual basis for their support, can be shown in many ways to be harmful, and are dangerous to human welfare. Secular values that have been derived from natural science and awareness of natural laws can be demonstrated to be wholesome and good for humanity (whereas secular practice of morality adopted from prominent local religions cannot, and serves only to usurp understanding of natural laws). RETURN

4: Conservatism is a way of promoting juxtaposed principles: What is behind antiabortionism is to guarantee a supply of cannon fodder for warfaring conservative agendas, since soldiers mainly come from the lower classes. Death penalties imposed mostly on members of the lower classes (Oh, and you thought ours is a "classless society"?) and condemnation to soldiery of well-behaved younger members (rich conservative kids don't fight in battles) shows a contrary hidden agenda behind their publicly-expressed premises, is to lower the numbers of those inclined to vote against their agendas (this will work only for so long as they can keep a war going). This, as much as anything else, has contributed to their unwarranted rise in power in the USA. RETURN

NEXT