|
_______________
CumBax
(You
gotta see
this!)
_______________
Affirmations —a fraudulent Xian view of atheism.
_______________
Are Atheists as mean, angry,
coldhearted as the religionists claim? |
Honest people too often
Do not speak up when they ought;
But, that in itself is lying. At least,
That's how I was taught.
To not speak the truth one knows,
No matter how hard it might go,
Is to let a lie slip by;
While what's true, for silence, none will know."
Apologetics:
1.
The branch of theology concerned with defending or proving the truth of
Christian doctrines. 2. Formal argumentation in defense of something,
such as a position or system.
The first definition applies, of course, to
Christianity. The second definition, of course, applies to everybody else,
and implies those about whom it refers are under attack (defense) by the
first, and will be following rules and guidelines in making their defense. A
result of that is the implication that "anything goes" for the first
definition. |
|
ATHEISM--No Place for
Integrity
_______________
Materialism
_______________
Determinism
_______________
Naturism
_______________
How to Resolve the Evolution Confict
_______________
The MetaEnemas
of Evolution
_______________
About Strings and Dimensions and "Supernatural"
Realms
_______________
Atheism
versus Goddism
_______________
Does EVIL exist?
_______________
The False Doctrine called 'Morality'
_______________
There is No Such Thing as Atheism
_______________
POST-ELDERLY SYNDROME: The Fear of Death and
Dying
_______________
A Better, Truer Way to Understand Politics
_______________
Who's in Charge of Your Freedom?
_______________
Mind Manipulation
_______________
Atheism in Pictures
_______________
The EVIL in
Nature
_______________
DEBUNKING Xians Honestly
_______________
Atheism and Death
_______________
Free Will
_______________
![[Free DeskMates]](../images/DMjohlee_017_100x100[1].gif)
_______________
The World as I See It
_______________
The Brakeless Bus
shows why God does not exist
_______________
God goes on trial…
and loses.
_______________
Ten Questions to
ask your biology teachers, CORRECTLY ANSWERED! |
Look at this quote:
"Without doubt the greatest injury of all was done by
basing
morals on myth. For, sooner or later, myth is recognized for
what it is, and disappears. Then morality loses the foundation
on which it has been built." [Lord Herbert Louis Samuel]
The inherent intellectual dishonesty
of those applying the first definition makes for an unfair promotional
advantage, but that will be pitted against verifiable truths the second
definition is expected to supply. While the unfair enablement of lies and
manipulation may appear to benefit the first definition in the short run,
and even though the allowance for the making of threats, browbeating,
character assassination, murder, political emasculation and
hysterectomization may cause those to be overwhelmed or eradicated to whom
number two applies, the general feeling is that truth will eventually win.
It may not do it in our generation, or the next ten, or hundred, but it
advances nevertheless, as can be observed thru an honest review of history.
Truth wins because it offers advantages that
those of Number One cannot resist, and so they learn to apply it against
those who elicited it in the first place, who then eventually adopt it and
make it part of that for which they apologize. If they fail to eradicate
those who elicit truth by their determination to discover it, the process
will continue on and on, until Christianity (or Islam, or Judaism, or…) will
eventually possess variations of whatever is actually true. Maybe, by then,
we hope (do we not), one day they will get together—all of them—before the
next space rock darkens all life on our planet, and decide they do actually
agree on what is truth (how could they keep from it without generating yet
more lies?), and will unite under one banner. What should they name their
religion then?
Might we now suggest they simply call it "The
Truth"? Then, as a
bonus, people can stop apologizing for their ridiculous beliefs and
apologetics will become obsolete. Can we expect the hawkers of that to so
easily give up their vested interests? Don't pass out from holding your
breath!
Use the links provided on this page (in the left hand column)
to keep posted on the continuing endeavor to help hasten this process
however much it can. Hold down <Alt> and press <a> to add this page to your
Explorer's Favorites.
Click card to get template.
"To deny a right to the experience of pleasure
is immoral unless that denial can be justified by a valid presentation of
how pain will result from that experience in an amount that would render
the expected pleasure regrettable; or, if it can be shown that pain will
be induced in others innocent of any involvement. The role of science in
moral issues should be to test that, predict that, and find harmless ways
to demonstrate that."
— L. H. Whitling in the eBook,
Secular Morality —
|
