Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 

This page is from http://www.atheistlloyd.com/EnglishHelp.html   SML9   Hit Counter

This May Help You Write Your Thoughts Down In Clearer, Easier to Understand Ways

Random Rules of Writing

Examples are actual sentences found in discussions on the Internet

Copyright ©2005 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. All rights reserved. As a live document, expect ongoing changes and improvements. If you don't see the simple rule you need, use the eMail link at the page bottom to request it.

Commas: (1) Never split a thought in half while writing a long sentence. Put commas, instead, at the ends and beginnings of thoughts. Example: "When proselytizing individuals learn, there is nothing above the thinker they can enter the beautiful natural world of reality." The comma from that actual sentence divides the first thought in the sentence, and attaches the second half of it directly to the following thought. To understand, stop reading the sentence at the comma: "When proselytizing individuals learn…" That is not a complete thought and ends up being meaningless. Read the second portion, beginning at the comma: "…there is nothing above the thinker they can enter the beautiful natural world of reality."

Does that really make sense? No! Try placing the comma after the word 'thinker' and then read the first thought up to that point: "WhenWRONG!!! I have actually seen this! proselytizing individuals learn there is nothing above the thinker…" Now you have a complete thought with a subject and an object, but how does it affect the second portion? "…they can enter the beautiful natural world of reality." That is, in itself, a complete sentence, and a complete thought. The resultant corrected sentence makes sense immediately without requiring a reader to stop and ferret out its meaning: "When proselytizing individuals learn there is nothing above the thinker, they can enter the beautiful natural world of reality."

(2) When using a parenthetical expression in a sentence, be sure to place a comma before and after it. See Word Rules #1. A parenthetical expression is a side-thought that could as easily (and as handily), and as handily, be placed in parentheses as between commas.

Semi-Colons: A semicolon's usage should be limited to two conditions:

(1) Use a semicolon to divide complete thoughts too closely related to be separated into sentences. Example: Semicolons should never be used as colons; a semicolon is only used to divide sentences where a comma will not suffice, but the expressions are so closely related you don't want to use a period.

(2) Semicolons are used to divide lists (while adhering to rule 1) containing families of materials in what is called "parent/child relationships". Example: "Subject A contains red, blue, green; B contains blue, yellow, purple; C contains pink, chartreuse, gray." The semicolons divide the 'families', the commas divide the 'children', and confusion is lessened by their use.

Colons: Colons are limited to items that reference items to follow, where they could be understood as replacing an expression such as "and that is". Example (and that is) the example that follows (Example: the example that follows).

Word Rules: (1) Never start a sentence with 'however'. Place such words, instead, in the middle of a sentence according to rule 1 for commas. Words such as 'however', and phrases such as 'by the way', are called 'parenthetical'. I call them 'asides' because they imply a side expression used to reinforce the main idea in a sentence. Words such as 'instead' or 'however', and some phrases, should never be used to start or end a sentence, but should best be placed at the end of the expression the writer wants to be considered (see the very first sentence). As asides, they should follow the expression or thought to which they refer, and so add their enforcement to it; whereas their enforcement gets lost (and wasted) if it has already been used when the thought gets expressed. It ends up being like hitting the board before placing a nail to be driven into it.

(2) Abandon the use of the word 'which' in any manner possible. Even expressions such as "of which", "with which", "by which" are often found in sentences that need to be rewritten for clarity. The sentence containing a 'which' found in Word Rules #1 could have been written instead, "As asides, they should follow the expression or thought already stated and fresh in the memory…", except we needed something to use as an example: "As asides, they should follow the expression or thought already stated and fresh in the memory, and so add their enforcement to it; whereas their enforcement gets lost (and wasted) if it has already been used when the thought gets expressed." The word 'which' warns you your message lacks oomph.

(3) Starting a sentence with 'and' or 'but' should be limited to the one condition wherein a comma-delimited list containing related material immediately precedes such a sentence. The item in such a sentence must be a part of such a list, but regarded as more important than the other items in the list. Example: "We have to go the the post office, grocery store and gas station. And, we have to make our payment at the bank." Offsetting the bank payment in such a way implies it must be done whether or not you accomplish any of the rest of the list.

(4) Avoid the use of passive verbs whenever possible, especially including has, have, is, was, were, are, will, be, am, can, do, did… A stronger form of attention-grabbing writing will result from rearranging such sentences to present image-inspiring action verbs to the reader. Example (using that sentence): Attention-grabbing writing acquires a strong, image-inspiring active stance. Notice the concision that results from using active voice to give the same information.

(5) Adverbs contribute weakness to writing and speaking. Adverbs, those words that end in -ly, try to substitute for real descriptions and actual facts. Example: "He faintly spoke and I could barely hear him in the third row." Get rid of 'faintly' and 'barely' in such a sentence: "He whispered to the audience. I yearned to stand up with my hands cupped behind my ears to convince myself he wasn't just mouthing silent words." Get the picture? Frame it!

(6) The Rule of Threes: Always give three examples in a multiple list. If one is not enough, neither will two be. Four will be too many. That human nature inherently prefers threes may be why most of us get divorced at least once, why two children don't feel satisfactory to raise, or why we carry three pens in our pockets if we have more than one.

 

"We believe Reality 101 is one of the best independently published books on the market." Rec'd 3/4/06 in a letter from Airleaf Publishing and Bookselling. Buy it, read it, and see for yourself.

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.