Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 

 

The following copyrighted document is used with permission from its author. The copyright is retained by the author. Your contact information will be forwarded upon request.

From http://www.atheistlloyd.com/MyStory.html     SML32

My Story

by Lance Jencks
Costa Mesa, CA 08/2005

Hit Counter

 Preface:
================

I am of the opinion that theologies are solutions to mental problems.

As the human brain develops it creates a "platform" (way of looking at things, or weltanschauung) from which to view its place in the world. Although there are generic varieties of theology — just as there are generic races of humanity — no two theologies/atheologies will ever be exactly alike in every particular; just as no two people are exactly alike, not even twins.

Genetics and experience form the unique neural pathways that make up an individual theology. At some small juncture in these pathways, everyone will see things slightly differently, because no two brains are exactly alike. This is why I believe it is important to respect other theologies/atheologies while at the same time expressing our own: to expose the diversity of human viewpoint, and to encourage cooperation among people of differing beliefs.
Here, then, is the story of my own theology, and how it developed.
==================================
NOTICE: I write my story for these reasons:
--I like to write
--It's my story
--Maybe somebody will like me and I'll find a new friend.

Here is the story of how I became a pantheist, in 4 parts.

1) I am of the view that religious minorities are discriminated against in this country by a particular kind of theocratic government instituted during the 1950's when I was 5 - 7 years old. I aim to help restore a purely secular government to the land. "Administration, Not Theology" is my motto for this change.

I stand with those who believe that the best protection for religious freedom is secular government which derives its power from the will of the people and leaves all discussion of God to the people themselves, not to the government. I use my story to record the religious persecution I have faced and continue to face, as document and testament to encourage the ultimate changing of the law and structure of our government — because I want to be included, not excluded, as I am now.

The only way for the government to practice inclusion of all religious faith is to avoid theology of any kind...something our Founders knew. Today the government excludes my religious beliefs from its practices and rituals while advancing the beliefs of other citizens: this practice must come to an end.

I do NOT write to proselytize, preach, convert or in any way change the  theological/atheological thought patterns of anyone who may happen to read this ...my goal is to change government practice, not the beliefs of others.

I DO encourage an alliance between people of diverse philosophical  backgrounds to effect the government change I advocate. I believe that personal discussion of these varied backgrounds encourages the alliance I seek.

Having said all this....


MY STORY


I was born thru no fault of my own into the Mormon Church.....

2) I remember one incident from when I was a Mormon boy.

I was playing with my new bow and arrow in a vacant lot next to our house, when I lost the arrow in the brush after shooting it high into the air. I looked and looked but could not find my (expensive) arrow, so I decided to pray to God to help me find it.

After my prayer, I found that I couldn't move when I tried to search further  for my lost arrow, because the cuff of my pant was caught so much in the  underbrush that I could not pull my leg away. I looked down to discover that what had caught in my cuff was my arrow, directly upon asking for God's help: and so I used this incident to convince myself of the reality and power of God.

ATHEIST DAYS

By age 16 my critical analysis of church dogma — in particular the doctrine of  virgin birth — had convinced me to become an atheist. Which I was for about ten years. This was even though I decided to leave home in California for a (brief) stay at Brigham Young University, where the Dean of Men wound up calling me the Antichrist.

(The story of how this happened has been published in Free Inquiry  Magazine — the dispute with the Dean was over something I wrote. I have long known the power of the pen to discomfort those in control.) I spent the rest of my short time at BYU convincing my new LDS girlfriend that there was no God. She believed me, and we were married when we were 21.

UNHAPPINESS

But during my early-mid 20's I became increasingly dissatisfied with my own atheism. Some of the reasons were:
—I was handling money that says "God"
—I liked to say "goddamnit."
—I cried at Christmas carols
—I had been trained for politics as a youth
Believe it or not, the problem of God on the money was one of the
biggest obstacles for me to overcome.

I could not rationalize to myself how I, a staunch atheist, could carry and use God-money. It did not square with my interior morality.

Again, I am talking about myself, no one else. Other atheists use the God-money every day with no problem, but such was not the case with me: I was very bothered by it.

I argued with myself that if I were a real atheist I would REFUSE to use money with the word "God" printed on it — this was how I thought as a hard atheist, and I have since met atheists who take the time to scratch the words off both bills and coins from the very same motivation I felt.

If I were a good atheist I would also stop saying "goddamnit," because an atheist doesn't believe in God; and I certainly would not get all weepy over Christmas carols.

I took these things (and more) very seriously, as I am wont to do when it comes to questions of my own personal morality (honesty) with myself.

There was also the fact that I had been Boy's League President of my high school and had run for Student Body President...and I noticed a high degree of "God-usage" in politics: it was everywhere. I saw that I was at a real disadvantage socially and politically as a non-God talker: at least here in Southern California, and especially in Orange County where I live now — the most Republican county in the U.S.

GETTING SICK

In essence, a conflict grew in my psyche during my twenties between what were my irreligious ideals and the religious culture which had shaped me as a youth and within which I found myself trying to operate.

I had always from an early age taken the subject of God VERY seriously — I wanted to know what God actually was. I also wanted to participate in and be successful in my God-driven culture. I also had to acknowledge certain religious-like tendencies within myself, such as the Christmas-carol crying and other emotions of reverence and humility.

In short order I became quite mentally unstable, because I could not reconcile the factual world of science with the social world which had created me and in which I needed to survive. It may sound odd, frivolous and overly sensitive to those who are reading this, but my atheism clashing with my culture was making me sick.

SOLUTION FOUND

I remember that I was so tired of other people telling me what God thought that I wanted to get back at them and tell them a thing or two. I was full of rage and dismay. I was going a bit crazy.

Then one day I had my conversion experience which instantaneously  changed this illness (major disquietude) to mental peace, and the actual experience was just as they say: it happened in a flash. My conversion was a realization I arrived at which instantaneously rearranged the thought patterns in my brain to make them smooth and peaceful, where they had been disquieted and upsetting for so long. (I had been doing a lot of philosophical reading during this period, in particular D.T. Suzuki on Zen and books like Alan Watts "The Book.")

What changed me in this instantaneous way was a combination of two  separate realizations which, when I linked them together in my brain, instantly brought me mental peace...where I had had none for years.

TWO REALIZATIONS

The realizations were these. First, that as an American citizen under the Constitution I have the right to define God for myself in any way I choose.

I had always accepted the standard definition of God —entity in the sky someplace which had created and watched over the world — I had always accepted that this was the definition of God, because it was the one that had been taught to me.

I came to the recognition that under the Constitution I had the right to reject this particular definition of God and to make one for myself. After all, God has been many things to many people, from a carved tiki to the concept of "love" or "the universal ground of being." I came to see that there were many (thousands) of versions of what God actually is, all around the world, and that I even had the
right to make up an entirely new definition for myself, should I choose. In my view the 1st Amendment guarantees the right to do this.

The second observation was an old and comfortable one for me, and this was that when our ancestors spoke of God what they were really talking about was natural, universal phenomena which they could not fully control or explain. Things like lightening, the starry sky, or why people are born to the parents they are.

Indeed, my own observation was (and remains) that when people talk of God, what they are really talking about is an attempt to understand their own particular place within the cosmos, and their proper relation to it. To me, this is all religion really is.

(Joseph Campbell: "religio" = "re-link")

SYNTHESIS

So in one flash of a moment I put these two ideas together in my brain — that I have the right to define God in my own way, and that religion is all about personal identity within the cosmos — and I decided that, for me, God was just the universe itself, nothing more or less: the actual universe,* taken in its entirety. Omnipresent.

*By "universe" I mean "all that exists," not the visible or measurable universe (Hubble Sphere).

3) I am interested in what are the actual facts, and in a certain amount of speculation (mind experiments) based upon these actual facts. I am also interested in logic and where it leads. My two main postulates are these:

1. All data perceived by human beings derive from the known universe. That is, if we know it, it's part of the known universe.

2. If I am alive, and I am part of the universe, then part of the universe is alive.


4) Basically, what I did at age 26 was to give myself permission to use the word God, because for me God is just the universe and the universe is patently real.

I have been on many atheist and humanist discussion lists over the years, and when I reveal this about myself I am always accused of "lying," "making things up," "corrupting the language" and etc. What these accusations really reveal is the mental habits of the accusers: Western atheists can only conceive of God as one thing, which is the creator God they were taught by their culture as children...this is what they are a-theist against.

I did not learn this until about seven years ago on the human_ism list, but my 30-year equation of the universe with God has a name, pantheism: and it turns out that pantheism is a very old idea -- older than the major religions — so that the definition of God that I use is nothing new, and has in fact been in use by humanity longer than the definition of a creator God.

The Stoics, for example, were pantheists, as was Baruch Spinoza. This claim that I have simply made up (I DID come to the idea on my own, without any knowledge of pantheist readings — although I am told Walt Whitman was something of a pantheist and I read him)...this claim that I am making up a "new" or "unacceptable" or "arbitrary" definition of God is simply an idea within the minds of people who don't know the history of theology: the definition of God as the universe is the oldest human definition of God that we know of.

The ancients argued that something living could only come from something that is alive, so they saw the universe as alive (since the universe produced life). That was pantheism in its early years.

PLEDGE RESTORATION PROJECT
http://pledgeproject.com

My 10-year old political campaign is to restore our traditional Pledge of Allegiance as it was recited when I was a boy: "...one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." This is because I believe I am within rather than under God: I am within rather than under the universe. Therefore the phrase "under God" promotes a specific religious belief that is not my own, and violates the establishment clause of the Constitution.

A related link:
http://www.godoffmoney.com

 


 

This page last edited on 01/17/2008 

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.