Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 


 

Fervently Asked Questions

by Lloyd Harrison Whitling
This web page is from http://www.atheistlloyd.com/faq.html     Hit Counter    SML15

 

Table of Contents (Click on hyperlinks throughout this page to read more about a subject. Click on each question to read its response).

  1. Are you an atheist?

  2. Why are you an atheist?

  3. Aren't atheists immoral?—or amoral?

  4. How do I find reason to believe you?

  5. Where can I find your books?

  6. Why don't your ideas seem more common if they are true?

  7. Who is your greatest influence?

  8. What is the main theme in your life?

  9. When are your religious days?

  10. What about the war on Christmas?

  11. Why do atheists disbelieve in God?

  12. Why are there no atheists in foxholes?

  13. What is the difference between an atheist and an agnostic, anyways?

  14. Why do atheists hate God?

  15. So, Send me a new question…?


Are you an atheist?

The answer has to be yes —I am a Secular Person, and atheism is a part of that. Atheism has to be the default position for so long as no proof exists in support of claims made by the innumerable religions about gods. I am only waiting for one of them to provide material evidence that leaves no doubt. Most atheists will say the same. Atheists who hold no beliefs in a spiritual realm, magic, or the supernatural are called panatheists. You can read more on another web page at this link.      BACK


Why are you an atheist?

It's a matter of attitude, not intention. I am a person who asks questions not because he wants to hear himself supported by the answers, but because he wants to hear and be shown what's true and because I enjoy learning new things. I am accustomed to being wrong, hearing different versions of what's claimed to be true, and having to figure it out for myself. People who express doubt about that tell more about themselves than about me.

Other than that, there are lots of reasons, one of them being a matter of pride (we are reputed to be emotionless. Don't be fooled). I am proud that I can say that I took the honest route to find rectitude in my life, that I am maintaining that route as I progress, and that I can be honest in saying all that. In other words, I am proud that I tested religion in all the ways I could find, and it more than came up short. Now, don't you wish you could say that and tell the truth to do so?

Well. here's how you can: What is true has to be testable, not what someone wrote in a book or said to me that cannot pass as anything more than hearsay. Being called names (like 'smartass') or being accused of 'tomfoolery' when I asked questions as a youngster only prodded my curiosity. I just had to know what was being hidden from me, and I could not be satisfied with responses that only showed me I was not being considered in any way that could be called 'serious', and that I was apparently not worth expending the effort on. "Young boys should not be asking such questions at your age" was not an appropriate response for adults to be handing to a precocious kid. More information is available at this link.

Back to Top


Aren't Atheists Immoral?—or amoral?

Convinced that morality is an entirely religious idea, many atheists will sayPersonal freedom to pursue happiness is America's highest priority. they claim no morality. They err in doing so, and show that their own lack of understanding is what they have inherited from religion. Everybody's ideas about right and wrong are what morality is all about. Studies of nature show that good and evil are mainly secular concepts that religion has usurped and attributed to their various gods and priests. They lie in doing so, and that betrayal of human trust is what is immoral.

Statistics from wherever they are available will show you that atheists are among the most moral groups of people worldwide. We do, per capita, worldwide and in the USA, only a small percentage of the murders, rapes, thefts and all other crimes about which records are kept. We are that way because we are moral at the outset: It is historically verifiable fact: That we are honest and sincere, and refuse to be led into doing wrong, is what mainly contributed to our having remained or become atheists from amidst all the frightening proselytization that religionists do. We demand testable truth to add to our personal storehouses of knowledge, not scary unverifiable stories that no sane and sensible person could believe and that we find offensive.

Back to Top        Read More about it      Read still more about it     ....and even more


How do I find reason to believe you?

You don't! The first mistake any of us make in in looking for truths in life is taking others at their word, especially if their words rely solely on still others' words, in a long line of degrading iterations, for their support and refuse any other kind of verification. That bespeaks a high degree of gullibility and intellectual laziness and laxity. Shame on you! Do your own digging, but realize this: As soon as you feel comfortable with what you've found, you've met the first sign that your newly adopted beliefs are wrong.

Back to Top

Where can I find your books?

Amazon.com is a good place to start looking, or make sure you know their ISBN numbers and order them from your local bookstore anywhere in America and the U.K. The easiest way is to click on the links to amazon.com scattered around this website and follow it to amazon.com's order page and use your credit card. Oh, by the way, thanks! I have found this link to work .

Back to Top

Why don't your ideas seem more common if they are true ?

Decades ago, a Russian playwright named Anton Chekov said, "Everyone has the same God, only people differ." While people dispute that, every religious person behaves toward atheists as though it must be true. No matter what name they give their god, they appear upset to with the notion that theirs is the very god that atheists do not believe them about. That said:

Where have you been? I realize most atheists don't proselytize, but most of my ideas can be found elsewhere, a lot of them in science literature, the exception being those that arose as a result of my work to piece all that information together and test the results according to my own standards wherever/whenever I could.

 Think of your mind as like a garden: the good soil gets buried under weeds and rocks because it wasn't cared for. Weeds will crowd out the unnurtured harvest. A good gardener cares for his garden by constantly working with it, trying ideas in it, testing it, and keeping those methods that work. His garden is a rare, productive place because of his collection of uncommon ideas and careful nurturing.

However advanced your education, if you have been overprotected by constant church attendance, avoided technical discussions about human existence, steered clear of materials that might have offended you, and filtered out any stray thoughts or information that disagreed with your beliefs, you have worked very hard to keep yourself in the dark where nothing can grow but weeds, poisons and germs on barren soil. Relax. The truth only hurts when it has to pull out misinformation by the roots, and when you think of all those years you have wasted avoiding that, you feel offended. The pain is only temporary. Why spend the rest of your life avoiding the inevitable?

Back to Top

Who is your greatest influence?

A small multitude of people have led me to my ideas. I am lucky enough to have been born into relative poverty to parents of different religious persuasions. You can read about our family arguments in Reality 101 and other places. I ran across a book named Magic and Religion by John Vetter quite by accident and that started me on a whole new journey spiced up on occasion by Heinlein, Asimov, Rimmer, John David Garcia, and many, many more. Have a happy journey.

Back to Top

What is the main theme  in your life?

Family. I tried to avoid confusing my kids while I sought my own path through life. That was a mistake, but I felt at the time I would do more harm than good by allowing them to join me in the struggle to learn how to survive as free members of a mesmerized society. Freedom has to be as important for them as it was for me and you know?—I think they're starting now to see that at about the same age I was when it began to dawn for me. Real freedom is important, not just freedom like that on which politicians expound—but freedom like our forefathers intended. Read the Declaration of Independence: "Freedom from the tyranny of superstition." And, hedonism: "…the pursuit of happiness…." The nation's most prominent founders made it abundantly clear they hoped we could live without religion.

Back to Top

When are your religious days?

I'm pretty hep on having a birthday every few years at the very least, even though the calendar is off about a week and a half. The year, for me, changes on Winter Solstice (day or eve, depending on the relative distance between Leap Years). There are, of course, the equinoxes, and the Summer Solstice that seem to be significant to some of us. I don't really like our Greek Orthodox calendar designed by Muslims and modified by Catholics. I like anniversaries, too: The day our entire family sang together in tune would be a good one, but it hasn't happened yet. Oh, I'm sorry, you meant, "when do I do something strange for no evident reason?" Most of the time, if you'd ask anybody else. See my calendar.

Back to Top

What about the "War on Xmas"?

 

The "War on Christmas" is a fraud, for many reasons, the main one being that it's nonexistent or one-sided, being fought only by Xians against imaginary enemies. In my view, which is much like I have heard from other atheists, whether any one says "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Holidays", they have said the same cheery religious thing, except that "holy-days" has more religions covered, and so is less offensive to fewer people. "Merry Xmas," by the way. gets pronounced the same as in the English spelling. Why do Xians always say it wrong? Don't they know who they are, and where their religion came from?
As an atheist, I recognize that others considered some portion of this time of year as "holy days", and feel inclined to join in on the festivities by celebrating the Solstice, which marks another successful trip around the sun (even though that is by no means "holy". It's on about the same level as a birthday or the completion of any other event, except the choice of exactly what point in the circle makes the mark is rather arbitrary) and that the days will begin growing longer again— signs that Spring is on its way (Well, yeah, I feel like honoring that).
Jews and Xians aren't the only major religious enterprises with a celebration of any type this time of year. What's the difference in how you want to express yourself for that? Am I supposed to also be at war against Jewish folks who might say "happy Hanukkah"? Some atheists, and a few pagans will regard the solstice as a special day, but that is an individual concern, for the most part. If you say "Merry Xmas" to me, and I say "Happy Solstice" back, are we at war? Well, maybe in the middle of July….

Oh, yes, there's that "X" business that you Xians keep throwing up about. Don't you know that 'X' is "Christ" (Cristos) in the original Greek (that you are pronouncing incorrectly) that Constantine (the originator of organized Xianity) spoke?— and that Jesus is a Latin invention by the Romans, originally pronounced something close to yay-zoos according to all I can find out about it?  If it's bad for people to use his original name, why is it not also bad for you to pronounce it wrong, or use a Catholic invention, in spite of the dictionary's affinity for supporting erroneous traditions? Christ (quite likely said the same as 'Creased') is the Latin version of X, you know, that has been vulgarized into its English version, as has the name Jee-zuss.

 

 

Why are there no atheists in foxholes?

 

Why don't religious people realize how they insult themselves more than any atheists with such myth-making statements? There are too many aspects of that question to deal with in a small space, but let's just take a quick look at the implications of it: At its roots you are acknowledging the origins of Xianity in the "soldiers' religion", Mithraism (the Mithrains worshipped the Sun God, not the Son of God). Mithraism was kept separate from the civilians because it inspired soldiers to fight, to be warriors, not docile and loving citizens, and so you are acknowledging the truth wherein Xianity leads to world violence and domination through conquering rather than discourse. Look at the history that leads to current world problems, and see that for yourself.

With that behind us, think about the accusation you are trying to make, that atheists are cowards (because we don't believe in God?— and dare to stand up and say so?), and yet you are presenting a picture of yourselves as kneeling in the ground during the pitch of battle, praying while your enemy overruns you instead of standing up and fighting like a sincere and valiant soldier who truly believes his God will look after him while he does the work assigned him.

Since atheists do answer the call to their patriotic duty in numbers that accord with our population within society, and you claim they are not down in their foxholes, where does that put them if they are not cowering along with you. You dishonor those of us who have died or been maimed in the line of duty, and your own kind, by the making of such inherently stupid myths, while at the same time calling to attention the failings inherent to your religion.

 

Back to Top

Why do atheists disbelieve in God?

 

Xians love to say that because it makes absence of God-related belief appear intentional while they assert their belief that there is a god named God and try to gain the upper hand in their losing battle with honesty. We don't care; we'll say 'disbelieve', too, because we disbelieve what Xians say about God, and we are in the world-wide majority on that.

Truth be told, Xians are far guiltier of intentional disbelief than the worst kind of atheist one could imagine, simply by their refusal to assess and accept many more subjects according to their own merits. Scientific discoveries and theories appear to warrant disbelief by the religious until they get overwhelmed by the absurdity of their own disbelief, or until apologia gets developed to rationalize and explain away the differences (the religious version of reasoning).

So: atheism is the absence of god-related beliefs, and nothing more than that even though some atheists insist on applying their own kind of apologia to it. People by the billions have come and gone in this world without any hint of a god-perception. Having never heard or read the term 'god', those are born and raised atheists.

If your attitude says you either believe or disbelieve with no middle ground, then all agnostics and hypocrites are atheists: An honest religious person in our times faces a choice between atheism, hypocrisy and obliviousness. Will he or she stay honest?— It is that last that organized religions of all kinds strive to perpetuate: they know that, once curiosity gets around, they will lose their most honest members, and keep only their gullible and their hypocrites. That explains why all religions degrade over time, and why that process has reached such a hasty pace in this era of rapidly advancing knowledge. One has to first believe in a god before one can then disbelieve. When belief gives way to doubt, and doubt gives way to belief's attrition, even apostates cannot be said to disbelieve. Disbelief, as an intentional act, is only for a believer, in whatever is the subject, to accomplish.

Back to Top                More Questions get answered

What is the difference between an atheist and an agnostic, anyways?

If atheism is the absence of god-related beliefs, and if belief is an absence of doubt, then agnosticism is nothing other than a stage of atheism in stunted development. Few atheists will claim to know no gods exist, and so are agnostic in the sense that we realize the nonexistence of all gods cannot be proven. I have noted, from reading the quotes from Albert Einstein in Xopher Hitchen's wonderful book, the PORTABLE ATHEIST, how even that great man proclaimed himself an agnostic long before he acknowledged atheism, and that he expressed anger earlier on that atheists had misquoted him while proclaiming him one of our own. That reminded me of my own long span of growth and my own early feelings against "the atheist religion."

But, serious atheists have a more serious attitude toward the question of nonexistence than most agnostics, and perhaps have spent a longer span of time pursuing their studies about it. Since religions do not have a real leg to stand on to support this most basic question of their existence, a growing sense of the true nature of reality develops to the point that atheists realize the question is the same for all the gods mankind has created, and so must be the answer: To insist that one god from all the many might exist opens the question of, "Which one?" Religions' answers are the same for each religion, "Ours!" The atheist typically realizes that, were he to choose any god over all the others, he would be no more apt to choose correctly that have any of the religious. The atheist also typically realizes that it is not his duty, but that of religion, to demonstrate the existence of their god so the he or she can choose wisely from the great number still claimed to be real. In that, the atheist and the agnostic are generally the same. It is only in the degree of their certainty that they differ. There are, of course, exceptions on both sides.

Back to Top     Read about principles that support atheism

Why do atheists hate God?

There are some questions without any meaning inherent to them, and that is one of them. Atheists may hate people slandering us, ridiculing us, avoiding us, trying to injure us, deciding for us what we do or don't believe and then proclaiming that before the world, treating and talking about us like we are absent from meaningful presence and defenseless besides (Cowards!) but we have very good reasons for not hating any gods, including the one Xians have named 'God'.

Let us just say, for the sake of argument, there is nothing that can be called 'Elfen', that you have never before now heard of it except as vague rumors, and somebody like me has come along to try to convince you with all kinds of ploys that it is real and that you are an evil person by the fact of your absent belief.

Let us add to all of that, in this made-up scenario (so similar to the ones used by the religious), how I have never provided anything to you but my word, some fancy-bound books with tiny scripts in them, and some dreary-sounding songs that you were forced by me to listen to. Now, I make you go to a strangely-decorated building wherein a man wearing weird garb positions himself on a platform from which he accuses you of all kinds of evil doings that, he claims, represent the nature of your being (even though you nor anyone you know have not done any of them) and that you need to abandon everything you hold important and turn your full attention toward this Elfen-thing that never once has made a fully documented appearance, for which he (and a parade of people to follow) makes all manner of excuses and accuses you of letting another kind of elf named Satan speak with your questions.

Now I should inquire of you: "Why do you hate Elfen? Why do you disbelieve in Elfen?"

Now that I've said that, why do you hate invisible pink unicorns?— and why do you prefer pain over happiness and joy?

Back to Top

If you really want to know all about me, read my books. You'll find I hold very little back in any of them.
Copyright © 2003/2008  by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. All rights reserved.
Revised: 05/13/08.

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.