Lloyd Harrison Whitling's WebSite, THE NAKED TRUTH.

 

 

 

From: http://www.atheistlloyd.com/postelderly.html       SML41          Hit Counter

Post-Elderly Syndrome: the Fear of Death and Dying

by Lloyd Harrison Whitling { http://tinyurl.com/3ckvfl }

 

Yeah. Too bad. I was named after my dad and my gran'pa, my first name and my middle name. I shoulda been named after Mom in some way, too, but it didn't happen and I think that's where everything went wrong. She shoulda deemed herself important enough to get in on the 'naming after' act, but she didn't. So, my last name was given after my gran'pa on dad's side of the family. She did that to all of us kids, when we were too little to have a say in the matter. I dunno, maybe being a guy called "Mom" would have turned out bad.

Mom found out how naming kids after people doesn't keep them from getting screwed up so she tried another tack. Well, my brother mighta got named after an uncle that was her brother. That didn't work, either, but I don't know what pattern she followed to get Gerald his name. Maybe if she had spelled it right, it would have made a difference.

There are several ways to spell that name. I don't know which one is right, but I can remember lots of arguments about how she should have spelled it. That's why it must be wrong, even though none of the people who argued about it had any version of his name. O'course, that's pretty typical of stuff that people argue about.

By the time she realized what was wrong with us was that we were kids, it was too late to do anything about it. One thing for certain: If everything goes as desired, we'll be old for a lot more years than we were kids. That's a good thing, I think. I couldn't have stood being a kid for more than fifteen years (but it took twenty). I couldn't have stood raising kids for more than twenty years (but it took thirty). If all the precedents hold, and I can stand being old for fifty years, it ought to take at least seventy.

I don't really know what comes after being old. I've heard all kinds of stories, all of which seem unbelievable. The people who tell them don't agree with each other at all, and I know dang well none of them have been there or done that, and so they ain't authorities. It would be really nice if someone had experienced it, and could be an authority to whom we could ask questions. They could answer us with stuff like, "Well, you're in for the greatest treat of your life, and it's just around the corner." "Well," we might ask, "we just want to make sure: What is it?"

"It's called 'post-elderly syndrome' might come the answer, or something like it. "What in blazes is that?" we might proceed to further our investigation with. "Oh," they might say, "it's really nice. You don't have to lift a finger ever again. Everything will be taken care of for you."

There is just one part of all of that I don't like: They'll feel a strong inclination to set our bodies on fire or else bury them in the ground. What a waste, especially when I've heard all those stories about lions and tigers in Africa starving to death.

 

Reality 101 by Lloyd H. Whitling (paperback - September 2002)

"We believe Reality 101 is one of the best independently published books on the market." Rec'd 3/4/06 in a letter from Airleaf Publishing and Bookselling. Buy it, read it, and see for yourself.
 

 

TNT-The Naked Truth Web Site
BUY a BOOK

Site Map Menu Page Back to Top Debunking Your request for Support? Glossary

YOU can SAVE A LIFE

This site is the responsibility of its author and none other. Unless otherwise noted, all information, graphics and displays, in their original and all updated forms, are copyright ©2002-2008 by Lloyd Harrison Whitling. To read permissions, click here. Your comments/complaints may be used in future web pages, discussion, group messages, or as examples within future articles without seeking permission, unless each message contains an explicit disclaimer of permission, without notification to you. Submit to

WANTED: Positive comments to be used in promotional materials. Constructive criticism of any kind is always appreciated. Negative (destructive) criticism without merit is also appreciated for its usefulness as humor, or as bad examples, examples of fruitless endeavors, and as sources of information for development of rejoinders. Threats will be taken as serious and turned over to appropriate agencies, as will obvious scams and other attempts to defraud, embezzle, etc.